Home MY NEWS ABOUT ME BOOKS HISTORY PRESS REVIEWS
Email Me

|
|

The first two
books of the
trilogy are
set from 79 to
83AD, when Agricola,
governor of
Roman Britain,
decided to try
and conquer
the north of
the island —
Scotland.
The third is set around 367 AD, near the end of the Roman occupation. Three main
waves of
Romans invaded
Scotland, and
not only did Agricola lead
the first, but
we know the
most about him
because the
famous Roman
historian
Tacitus was
his
son-in-law. So
I have
generally
stuck to Tacitus’s
facts as we
know them, and
made up the
rest! Another Roman historian, Ammianus Marcellinus, provided the text on
which I based the military events of the third book.
The Celtic
side of the
story has been
pieced
together from
bits of what
we know, and
archaeology,
and inferences
from elsewhere
in the Celtic
world. We know
so little
about the
tribes in
Scotland at
this time, the
forerunners of
the Picts, but
there are
tantalising
hints that
their royal
blood may have
been passed
down through
their females
— from a king
through the
king’s sister
to his nephew,
for example,
rather than
from father to
son. This
tidbit was the
starting point
of my story.
We also know
they lived in
thatched
roundhouses
clustered
sometimes in
‘duns’ or
forts, that
they grazed
cattle and
sheep, grew
barley and
some wheat,
and had a
warrior
society based
on swords.
They made
intricate
jewellery and
believed in a
range of
nature-based
gods and
goddesses.
There’s not a
lot else we do
know!
Here is some
other
historical
information —
relating to
the first two
books
particularly —
taken from the
note at the
end of The
White Mare.
Historical
Background
|
|
|
Dalriada
Later
Irish
and
Scottish
annals
speak of
a people
who came
from
Ulster
in
northern
Ireland
to
colonize
Argyll
in
western
Scotland
sometime
in the
sixth
century
AD. This
colony
of
Gaels,
as they
were
known,
established
their
king’s
seat at
the fort
of
Dunadd
near
Kilmartin
in
Argyll,
bringing
the
Gaelic
language
to
Scotland.
However,
most
scholars
agree
that,
because
of the
close
proximity
of their
coastlines,
the
northern
Irish
were
probably
in close
contact
with
western
Scotland
centuries
before
the
accepted
colonization.
So the
first
real
contact
between
Argyll
and
Dalriada
could
easily
have
been
made as
far back
as the
first
century,
as in my
books,
since I
am not
proposing
a
wholesale
movement
of
people
at this
time.
Dunadd
The
hillfort
of
Dunadd
near
Kilmartin
in
Argyll
is now
accepted
as the
royal
seat of
the
kings of
Scottish
Dalriada
from
approximately
the
fifth to
tenth
centuries
AD, when
it
became a
centre
of trade
and fine
craftsmanship.
However,
excavations
have
proven
that
people
were
living,
or at
least
visiting
the site
for
thousands
of years
before
that,
including
the time
around
the
Roman
invasions
of
Scotland.
It is
unlikely
that a
prominent
volcanic
crag
close to
the sea
would
not have
been
used by
the
earlier
Celtic
peoples
of the
area.
Excavations
have
focused
on the
stone
walls
built in
the
middle
of the
first
millennium,
and it
is
entirely
possible
that
traces
of
timber
buildings
have
either
been
missed,
or were
destroyed
during
later
building
on the
site. To
my
knowledge,
the
plain
around
the
crag’s
feet has
not been
excavated.
Picts
and
Gaels
The name
‘Pict’
is not
used by
Roman
writers
for the
peoples
of
Scotland
until
the
fourth
century,
and may
come
from a
Roman
term
meaning
‘painted
people’.
However,
although
my
characters
obviously
‘became’
the
Picts,
we don’t
know
what
they
called
themselves.
So I’ve
stuck to
the old
name for
Scotland,
Alba,
and
called
them
Albans.
With
regard
to the
‘Gaels’,
there is
strong
evidence
that
this is
what the
early
peoples
of
Scotland
called
those
from
Ireland.
Argyll,
where
the
Dalriadans
later
had
their
centre
of
power,
means
‘coast
of the
Gael’.

Language
By the
sixth
century
there is
some
evidence
that the
Picts
(descendants
of
Scottish
people)
and
Argyll
Scots
(descendants
of the
Dalriadan
Irish)
spoke a
mutually
unintelligible
form of
the
Celtic
language.
However,
languages
can
change
rapidly,
and we
don’t
know how
close
the two
were in
the
first
century,
although
many
people
think it
is
likely
to have
been
much
closer.
I’ve
left
them
speaking
essentially
the same
language.
|
|
|